PULASKI COUNTY DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Year 2009 - 2010

Timothy Eaton
Reponsible Person

Lisa Colyer Mardi Montgomery
Contact Person

 Approved :
12/15/2009
Date

Members or Committee:
Phillip Wilson
Bill White
Cindy Price
Samatha Stevens
Olivia Minton

Executive Summary
PULASKI COUNTY
Mission Statement: "The Pulaski County School System will ensure a quality, comprehensive education for each student." Every district employee was afforded an opportunity to offer input into the development of the mission statement, as documented in the official CDIP Notebook. The board of education approved the mission statement on February 12, 2008. During all stages of the development of the plan, the mission provided committee members with a direction for discussions and a focus for decisions. The public review of the complete plan, including the mission/vision statements, was conducted during a two-week period beginning May 26th through June 6, 2008. The mission statement will serve as the primary standard by which our district will evaluate the plan’s effectiveness throughout the one year implementation.
Needs Assessment: *Tier III requirement review: After a review of the most recent 2008 - 2009 data for all schools, the district dtermined the 2008 - 2009 improvement plan was successful in bringing about student achievement improvement. The district acknowledges that according to KDE data, the district met 13 out of 13 targeted goals for NCLB (100%). Although there has been progress, on-going improvement is necessary in the followoing areas: targeted focus groups of students with disabilities i.e. specifically students at the middle and high school levels. Response to Intervention (RTI) has been implemented and/or fully implemented K-12 and in on-going. Due to improved student success and monitoring of NCLB targeted goals, the ASSIST team, implemented October 2008, has now been released by KDE for Pulaski County Schools as of October 2009. In addition, the district has completed a new technology plan with a focus on improved instruction and student success. Due to the progress made with the targeted goals and objectives in the 2008 - 2009 plan, many of the implemented activites and strategies are on-going with improvements to meet all tageted NCLB goals for the 2009 - 2010 school year. This is previous data: (2007 - 2008 Needs Assessment) After a review of the data of all schools, the district determined the 2006-2008 improvement plan did not bring about the desired increase in student achievement for all students for the following reasons (1) the plan does not adequately address the targeted focus groups of students with disabilities i.e. specifically students at the middle and high school levels. The district acknowledges that according to KDE data, all eight of the elementary schools met or exceeded their targeted goals; however, according to KDE data for NCLB, the middle schools and high schools did not meet all of their targeted goals. The Pulaski County district met 11 out of 13 targeted goals for NCLB (84.6%). This data indicates that parts of the previous plan are working and student achievement is increasing at some levels. Under NCLB the two objectives that are priority needs are: (1) Reading for Students with Disabilities (2) Math for Students with Disabilities. As part of the needs assessment process, the central office completed a review of the January, 2008 Kentucky Department of Education's Scholastic Review results based on the Standards and Indicators for District Improvement. Staff identified some parts which were completed in past years and did not need to be repeated in the current school year, and identified those priorities necessary to achieve NCLB/AYP and improved student acheivement on multiple forms of assessment. Test data analysis was completed on October 4, 2007. The SISI-based self-study was completed by December 20, 2007. Other data reviews, completed on March 17th and 18th, 2008, included schools’ key findings, school plans, the district report card, KASC Gap Analysis Reports, and other program-specific reports. The needs assessment committee used the data review to compile a list of key findings, to identify priorities, and to develop goals and objectives. This step was completed on May 5, 2008. After a thorough analysis of both the 2008 NCLB district data, and the 2008 KCCT data, the following: (1) Implementation of new math and reading interventions at the middle and high school levels with targeted focus groups of students (2) Professional Development for Special Education and ESS/AmeriCorps employees with focus groups for specific improved reading and math interventions i. e., Read 180, SRA, SuccessMaker Math, Word Mapping, Word ID and Sentence Writing, Great Leaps (3) Middle and high school learning check implemented in all areas and on-going review (4) Daily communication with school leadership regarding interventions and progress monitoring. Goals:
Each needs assessment subcommittee reviewed specific data for thie content area and recommended priority needs to be addressed in the 2008 - 2009 CDIP. The component managers developed measurable goals, identified benchmarks and drafted strategies to accomplish the goals. The Component Managers shared the draft plan with their needs assessment subcommittees to review and provide feedback. A cross-walk was also completed between the district plan and the 2008 KDE Scholastic Review Summary Recommendations. One hundred percent of the recommendations found in the summary sections are addressed by the district plan. Strategies that incorporate the scholastic review recommendations and NCLB targets are emedded throughout the district plan, specifically in the components for Tier 3 District Improvement Plans.
Evaluation:
The effectiveness of the 2009 - 2010 plan will be evaluated through implementation and impact checks at each benchmark date. At least two benchmarks were established for each measurable goal in order to assess progress throught the year. Implementation and impact checks will be completed at each benchmark date to determine the implementation level for each strategy and the impact of the strategy on the benchmark assessment. Progress on the plan strategies will be made based on the reveiw of the benchmark data in order to maximize the likelihood of accomplishing the goals set forth in the district plan.
Stakeholders:
May 5, 2008: Consolidated District Improvement Plan (CDIP) Needs Assessment Committee: The primary responsibility of this committee was to review data in order to determine a list of key findings which serve as a focus for improvement efforts during the next two years. Louie Childers, Southwestern High School Counselor, Angela Murphy, Principal, Northern Middle School, Lori Phelps, Pulaski Elementary Parent, Mark Hamm, Parent/Community Member, Phoenix Preferred Care, Lori Hall, Pupil Support Personnel, Central Office, Wanda Lowe, Administrative Assistant, Central Office, Kathryn Crawford, Student, Pulaski County High School, Jacob Bellwood, Student, Southwestern High School, Sonya Wilds, Director, Pupil Support Personnel, Central Office, Teresa Nicholas, District Technology Coordinator, Central Office. May 12, 2008; Comprehensive Planning Committee: The primary responsibility of this committee was to develop an action plan that addresses district needs as identified by the Needs Assessment Committee. Holly Tyler, Teacher, Eubank Elementary School, Julie Cottrell, Principal, Woodstock Elementary School, Angela Wilson, Assistant Principal, Pulaski Elementary Schools, Virginia Hess, Instructional Supervisor, Central Office, Alfreida Daulton, Program Director, Central Office, Kathy Epperson, Special Education Administrative Assistant, Cindy Price, Board Member, Pulaski County Schools, Holly Bowers, Community Education/Character Education/Classified Staff, Central Office Angie Flynn, District Parent Advisory Committee, Alesa Johnson, Parent/Community Member, KCTCS, Pam Cate, FYRSC Director, PCHS, Bill Boyd, Finance Director, Central Office, Rebecca Wright, Finance Officer I, Central Office. May 19, 2008: District Reveiw Team: The primary responsibility of the District Reiview Team was to evaluate it for effectiveness, accuracy, and compliance. Tim Eaton, Superintendent, Margaret Mauney, Instructional Supervisor, Central Office, April McFalls, Parent/Council Member, Southern Middle School, Kelli Robinson, Parent/Council Member, Oakhill Elementary School, Administrative Assistant, Central Office, John Harville, Community Member, CPA, Nikki Wilson, Student, Southwestern High School, Arthur Crawford, Assistant Principal, Southwestern High School.

Component: Academic Performance
Component Manager:
Carole Hancock
Date: 12/11/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need: District leadership has not ensured that all students receive instruction in an intentionally mapped K -12 curriculum that is aligned to current Kentucky curriculum documents and is consistently taught district wide.
Goal: By May 2010, district leadership will have completed 50% of K-12 intentinally mapped curriculum that is aligned to current Kentucky curriculum documents and is consistently taught district-wide and updated as necessary.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Vertical and horizontal alignment and curriculum mapping documents % district-wide 5/8/2010 50
Three annual progress reports for vertical and horizontal alignment and curriculum mapping documents 5/8/2010 3


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will provide leadership and guidance for K-12 vertical and horizontal alignment of curriculum maps in all content areas. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
800.00 PD
   
2 Both District leadership will provide guidance for the development and implementation of regular student learning checks in each core academic area. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
800.00 PD
   
Priority Need: Formal protocols for use in analyzing student work samples and formative daignostic assessment data are not used in all schools.
Goal: By May 2010, three (3) district level implementation and impact checks will reflect (elementary, middle and high) use of protocols for analyzing student work and formative diagnostic assessment in all schools.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Three district level (elementary, middle and high) implementation and impact checks 5/8/2010 100
Evidenced three times yearly in school-level implementation and impact checks 5/8/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership team will review each school's CSIP implementation and impact checks for use of multiple assessments to ensure assessments are specifically designed to provide meaningful feedback on student learning for instructional purposes. Supervisors 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: District leadership has not established procedures to effectively monitor district and school initatives including delivery of rigorous instruction.
Goal: By May 2010, district leadership will estabilsh procedures to effectively monitor district and school initatives including delivery of rigorous instruction for all students three times yearly.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Evidenced three times yearly in school-level implementation and impact checks 5/8/2010 100
Three district level (elementary, middle and high) implementation and impact checks 5/8/2010 100
E- Walks 5/8/2010 100
Individual Learning Plan Data Reports (Required Grades) 5/14/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will monitor longitudinal data for teacher performance and efficacy through e-walks. Supervisors 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership will ensure school leaders will present bi-annual presentations to district leadership team that explain the specific intervention strategies currently in use to address individual student's unique learning needs and evidence of student performance to validate progress. Supervisors 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3 NCLB District leadership will ensure all students in middle and high school will have an electronic Individual Learning Plan. Supervisors 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
49,534.13 General Fund
   
Priority Need: District leadership has not adequately defined or modeled proficiency across all content areas and across all grade levels for all staff.
Goal: By May 2010, district leadership will provide opportunites for defining, modeling and supporting examples of proficient work for K- 12.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Professional Development Sign-in and Evaluation Sheets 5/8/2010 100
Improved % Prof/Dist on KCCT 5/8/2010 10


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will define, model and support proficient work from priority need content areas from all targeted students (e.g., curriculum specialists and district professional development). Supervisors 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership will ensure that all instructional staff are aware of what proficient work looks like for appropriate grade leveles, reinforcing Core Content for Assessment version, 4.1 and Depth of Knowledge concepts. Supervisors 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: To enable students to use technology to become independent life-long learners.
Goal: By May 2010, district leadership will develop a student technology skills assessment tool.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
E-Walks % increase in use through technology template 5/13/2010 5
Kentucky Department of Education Technology Activity Report 5/13/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both Provide schools with technical, instructional, and administrative support to ensure that all students have equitable access to integrated technology. Nicholas 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
450,989.00 General Fund
   
2 Both Communicate with parents via AUP in the Code of Conduct, email and school websites how technology is being applied in their child's education so parents can reinforce the instruction their child receives at school at home. Nicholas 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
49,534.13 General Fund
   
3 Both Update the district's techonology plan to comply with NCLB and Universal Service Funds requirements. Nicholas 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   

Component: Arts Humanities
Component Manager:
Mardi Montgomery
Date: 10/12/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY

Component: Efficiency
Component Manager:
Steve Butcher
Date: 12/11/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need: District leadership has not provided a systematic process of district support for all school councils to optimize council success.
Goal: By May 2010, district leadership will review the district-wide council training hours, school council liaison reports and district-wide annual council reports (policies, by-laws and student-centered goals).

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Annual Council Report 5/12/2010 100
Annual School Council Liaison Report 5/12/2010 100
Annual Council Report 5/12/2010 100
Annual School Council Liaison Report 5/12/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will identify school council liaisons to support the director of curriclum in overseeing council policy development and operations with an intentional focus on instructional matters that impact student academic performance. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
1 Both District leadership will develop a systemic process that ensures all required policies and by-laws are in place, student-centered and annually reveiwed. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
1 NCLB District leadership will offer training opportunities for council members and parents for the following Site-Based Council modules. Hancock 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
2,000.00 SBDM
   
Priority Need: The district leadership will ensure increases in number of highly qualifed teachers who are receiving high quality professional development.
Goal: The district ranking report will reflect 100% highly qualified teachers in all positions.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
District Ranking Report 10/30/2010 100
District Ranking Report 2/28/2011 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB All new teachers participate in the Pulaski County Schools Beginning Teacher Induction year-long professional development program, as well as, on-going district professional development with all researched-based practices. Hancock 6/30/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 NCLB Due to critical shortage areas in the state of Kentucky, predominately math, science and special education, all Pulaski County teachers hired under critical shortage needs will have an improvement plan and be enrolled in an accredited postsecondary institution to obtain highly qualified certification. Hancock 6/30/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: Provide equal distribution of highly qualified and effective teachers, by ensuring that low income and minority students are not taught at higher rates than other children are by non-highly qualified and in experienced teachers.
Goal: Equal distirbution of highly and efficetive teachers, by ensuring that low income and minority students are not taught at higher

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Ranking Report 6/30/2010 100
School Distribution Report 6/30/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB Pulaski County School District will recruit and retain highly qualified teachers and use them with class size reduction, Measures to recruit and retain highly qualified teachers will be through state and regional job fairs, teacher accredited postsecondary on-campus recruiting and district-level screening with use of School Recruiter and Teacher Insights. Hancock 6/30/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   

Component: Efficiency
Component Manager:
Steve Butcher
Date: 12/11/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need: District leadership has not provided a systematic process of district support for all school councils to optimize council success.
Goal: By May 2010, district leadership will review the district-wide council training hours, school council liaison reports and district-wide annual council reports (policies, by-laws and student-centered goals).

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Annual Council Report 5/12/2010 100
Annual School Council Liaison Report 5/12/2010 100
Annual Council Report 5/12/2010 100
Annual School Council Liaison Report 5/12/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will identify school council liaisons to support the director of curriclum in overseeing council policy development and operations with an intentional focus on instructional matters that impact student academic performance. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
1 Both District leadership will develop a systemic process that ensures all required policies and by-laws are in place, student-centered and annually reveiwed. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
1 NCLB District leadership will offer training opportunities for council members and parents for the following Site-Based Council modules. Hancock 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
2,000.00 SBDM
   
Priority Need: The district leadership will ensure increases in number of highly qualifed teachers who are receiving high quality professional development.
Goal: The district ranking report will reflect 100% highly qualified teachers in all positions.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
District Ranking Report 10/30/2010 100
District Ranking Report 2/28/2011 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB All new teachers participate in the Pulaski County Schools Beginning Teacher Induction year-long professional development program, as well as, on-going district professional development with all researched-based practices. Hancock 6/30/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 NCLB Due to critical shortage areas in the state of Kentucky, predominately math, science and special education, all Pulaski County teachers hired under critical shortage needs will have an improvement plan and be enrolled in an accredited postsecondary institution to obtain highly qualified certification. Hancock 6/30/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: Provide equal distribution of highly qualified and effective teachers, by ensuring that low income and minority students are not taught at higher rates than other children are by non-highly qualified and in experienced teachers.
Goal: Equal distirbution of highly and efficetive teachers, by ensuring that low income and minority students are not taught at higher

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Ranking Report 6/30/2010 100
School Distribution Report 6/30/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB Pulaski County School District will recruit and retain highly qualified teachers and use them with class size reduction, Measures to recruit and retain highly qualified teachers will be through state and regional job fairs, teacher accredited postsecondary on-campus recruiting and district-level screening with use of School Recruiter and Teacher Insights. Hancock 6/30/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   

Component: Learning Environment
Component Manager:
Sonya Wilds
Date: 12/11/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need: All students need to be provided opportunities for additional assistance.
Goal: By May 2010, the district distinguished and proficient will increase by 10% and behavorial referrals will decrease by 6%.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Extended School Services % increase 5 5/8/2010 5
District % Prof/Dist KCCT 5/8/2010 10
District Suspension Data % decrease 5/13/2010 2


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will ensure three yearly reviews of services currently available and identify the need for additional services not currently available. *Student Services Meetings Held: 9/3; 10/1 *Ongoing daily collaboration Wilds 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership will facilitate collaboration and coordination among support programs and services (e.g., Title 1, Extended School Services, Family Resource/Youth Services Center, school guidance programs and mental and/or chronic health need) to eliminate gaps and unnecessary overlaps in delivery of services supporting positive student social/emotional health and improved student achievement. Wilds 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3 NCLB Provide alternative education settings for qualifying at-risk students. Wilds 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: Professional development must be derived from staff evaluations, growth plans, and other supportive data.
Goal: By May 2010, district leadership will develop and implement a district-wide data repository for improved effectiveness and efficiencies in professional development and improved student achievement.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
District KCCT increased % Prof/Dist 5/8/2010 10
EXPLORE % increased 8th grade average 5/8/2010 11
PLAN % increased 10th grade average 12/30/2010 10
ACT % increased 11th grade average 5/30/2010 15
Advanced Placement % increased district-wide scoring 3,4 or 5. 7/30/2010 18


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will review all professional development activities identified in the improvment plans at both the school and district level (elementary, middle and high) to ensure there is a direct connection to the learning needs of students as documented by an analysis of assessment data, including the needs of subpopulations with demonstrated achievement gaps. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership (elementary, middle and high) will return to the school leadership the professional development plans that do not have a direct connection to student achievement data. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3 Both District leadership will provide assistance as needed (elementary, middle and high) to school leadership to revise the CSIP plans demonstrating a direct connection to the findings in the analysis of student achievement data and professional development. Hancock 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: Schools must provide behavioral programs that address individual school and student needs such as RTI, KY-CID, Bullying Education, Prevention Programming, Character Education, Social Skills Instruction as well as programming to address substance abuse issues. (Too Good for Drugs, drug testing, counseling, attendance initiatives and alcohol reduction programs)
Goal: By May 2010, district-wide suspension and behavior referrals will decrease by 6%.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
District-wide suspension % decrease 5/8/2010 6
District-wide referral % decrease 5/8/2010 6


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will take specific actions (RTI, KY-CID, Bullying Education Prevention programming, Character Education, Social Skills Instruction, Too Good for Drugs, drug testing, counseling and alcohol reduction programs) to address the unique needs of schools with a disproportionate number of students in life circumstances with significant barriers to learning. Wilds 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership will provide all teachers with curricular materials and resources for instructional practices that are appropriate to the intellectual, cultural and physical attributes of the students (Too Good for Drugs, Character Education, Bullying Education Prevention, Social Skills Instruction and substance abuse reduction curriculum). Wilds 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: Ensure equal access to telecommunications and technology for all students, teachers, and administrators.
Goal: By May 2010, Kentucky Department of Education Technology Tools Readiness Survey will reflect 100% access to telecommunications and technology for all students, teachers and administrators at a 6 to 1 ratio or better.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Kentucky Department of Education Technology Tools Readiness Survey 5/9/2010 100
Kentucky Department of Education Technology Activity Report 5/9/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB Provide schools with equitable access to computers and related equipment, aplication software, electronic mail and anivirus. Nicholas 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
788,000 General Fund
170,000 KETS
325,000 Building and Grounds
   
2 NCLB Provide schools with equitable access to telecommunications (via local and long-distance telephone service, cell phone service, pager service) and insturctional technology (via Wide Area Network services through participation in the Universsal Service funding, state, and local technology programs. Nicholas 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
242,000 General Fund
   
3 NA Provide schools with technical, instructional, and administrative support to ensure that all students have equitable access to integrated technology. Nicholas 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
450,989 General Fund
   
4          
   
   
Priority Need: To empower teachers to use technology as a tool to improve learning for all students.
Goal: By May 2010, a reduction of 5% novice rating among teacher technology skills as reflected in the Pulaski Assessment of Computer Expertise (PACE).

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Pulaski Assessment of Computer Expertise % reduction in novice rating 5/9/2010 5
Kentucky Department of Education Technology Tools Readiness Survey 5/9/2010 100
Kentucky Department of Education Technology Activity Report 5/14/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB Provide information, training, and support to district Technology Leadership Team (School Technology Coordinators, Library Media Specialists, Curriculum Specialists and Technology Intergration Specialist) according to need. Nicholas 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 NA Assess telecommunications services, hardware, software, and other services using the OET Technology Tools Readiness Survey. Evaluate teachers' techonology skills using a teacher technology assessment tool. Nicholas 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3          
   
   
Priority Need: Continue to promote effective parental involvement in the schools served by the district.
Goal: By May 2010, parental involvement in the schools served by the district will increase 2%.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
Parent Volunteer Hours (Sign-In Sheets) % increase 5/14/2010 1
Family and Community Involvement Report % increase 5/14/2010 1


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB By May 2010, district leadership will provide parental workshops in the following areas: Paired Reading, How to do Homework without Throwing Up and How to Communicate with your Child on Sensitive Issues. Wilds 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 NCLB District leadership will provide a parent liaison to coordinate and support volunteer programs in each school. Wilds 7/1/2009 5/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3 NCLB District Superintendent will continue to meet quarterly with the Pulaski County Parent Advisory Group (new members yearly). Eaton 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
4 NCLB District leadership will notify all parents of Tier III statues through personal letter. Eaton 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
5 NCLB By May 2009, district leadership will provide parental workshops for transition from preschool to kindergarten. Polston 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   

Component: Math
Component Manager:
Carole Hancock
Date: 12/11/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need: In May 2009, the percentage of elementary students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math was 79.48 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Math was 5.33 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, our school's Math Index was 107.07 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, 13 out of 13 NCLB subgroups reached their NCLB Math proficiency target as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010, the percentage of elementary students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 6.83 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math of 86.32 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Math will decrease by -0.11 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Math of 5.22 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, ALL NCLB subgroups will reach their NCLB Math proficiency target of 61.2 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % Increase Proficient/Distinguished 9/30/2010 7
NCLB/AYP % Target Goals 9/30/2010 100
IOWA Results % National Percentile Ranking (Not School Norm) 6/30/2010 80


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership team will systematically review school's use of common assessments to ensure meaningful feedback of student learning for instructional purposes. Polston 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership will monitor results to ensure a successful implementation of SuccessMaker Math. Polston 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3 Both District leadership will provide professional development in researched-based strategies for improved student acheivement in math ( District math coach training and summer profressional development). Polston 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
4 Both District leadership will provide schools with ESL/ELS with informational resources that are aligned to Core Content, version 4.1 and Kentucky Program of Studies. Hess 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
2,000.00 Immigrant Funding
   
Priority Need: In May 2009, our middle school's Math Index was 92.14 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math was 63.88 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Math was 11.08 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, 13 out of 13 NCLB subgroups reached their NCLB Math proficiency target as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2008, the percentage of students With Disability students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math was 45.10 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010, our middle school's Math Index will increase by 2.62 for a total Math Index of 94.76 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 12.04 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math of 75.92 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Math will decrease by -2.03 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Math of 9.05 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, ALL NCLB subgroups will reach their NCLB Math proficiency target of 58.3 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of With Disability students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math will increase to 63.4 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/Distinguished 9/30/2010 1
NCLB/AYP % Targeted Goals 9/30/2010 100
EXPLORE Results % average increase 1/30/2010 10
IOWA (NRT) % increase National Percentile Ranking 6/30/2010 80


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership team will systematically review school's use of common assessments to ensure meaningful feedback of student learning for instructional purposes. Hess 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership will provide professional development opportunities in researched-based strategies for improved student acheivement in math. Hess 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3 NCLB District leadership will provide schools with ELL students with information resources that are aligned to Core Content, version 4.1, and Kentucky Program of Studies. Hess 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: In May 2009, our high school's Math Index was 72.69 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math was 45.87 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Math was 22.46 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, 13 out of 13 NCLB subgroups reached their NCLB Math proficiency target as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2008, the percentage of With Disability students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math was 21.74 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2008, the percentage of Free/Reduced Lunch students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math was 40.57 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010, our high school's Math Index will increase by 9.10 for a total Math Index of 81.79 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 18.04 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math of 63.91 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Math will decrease by -5.82 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Math of 16.64 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, ALL NCLB subgroups will reach their NCLB Math proficiency target of 59.9 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of With Disability students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math will increase to 47.8 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of Free/Reduced Lunch students scoring proficient or distinguished in Math will increase to 60.4 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/ Distinguished 9/30/2010 9
NCLB/AYP % targeted goals 9/30/2010 100
Pulaski Assesssment of Math % mastery increase 6/30/2010 10
SuccessMaker Math % mastery increase 5/14/2010 10


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership team will systematically review school's use of common assessments to ensure meaningful feedback of student learning for instructional purposes. Ellis 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership will provide professional development opportunities in researched-based strategies for improved student acheivement in math. Ellis 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   

Component: Practical Living
Component Manager:

Date: 10/12/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY

Component: Reading
Component Manager:
Carole Hancock
Date: 12/11/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need: In May 2009, our middle school's Reading Index was 96.42 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading was 72.24 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Reading was 4.97 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010, our middle school's Reading Index will increase by 1.19 for a total Reading Index of 97.61 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 9.25 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading of 81.49 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Reading will decrease by Met Goal for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Reading of 4.98 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/Distinguished 9/30/2010 9.25
NCLB AYP % Target Goals 9/15/2010 100
EXPLORE Results % average increase 1/30/2011 10


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will provide training opportunites in best practices to enable teachers address differentiated instruction for improved student success. Hess 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
2 Both District leadership team will montior, three times yearly, implementation and results of reading intervention for all targeted students. Hess 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
3 Both District leadership team will systematically review school's use of common assessments for targeted students to ensure meaninful feedback in instruction for improved student learning. Hess 5/31/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need: In May 2009, our high school's Reading Index was 93.65 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading was 69.45 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Reading was 3.94 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, 10 out of 13 NCLB subgroups reached their NCLB Reading proficiency target as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2008, the percentage of With Disability students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading was 15.71 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010, our high school's Reading Index will increase by 2.11for a total Reading Index of 95.77 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 10.18 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading of 79.63 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Reading will decrease by Met Goal for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Reading of 4.29 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, ALL NCLB subgroups will reach their NCLB Reading proficiency target of 59.6 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of With Disability students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading will increase to 79.6 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/Distinguished 9/30/2010 2
NCLB/AYP % Target Goals 9/15/2010 100


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership will provide training opportunities of best practices to enable teachers to address differentiation instruction for improved student success. Ellis 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
0 Title IV
0 Rural Initiatives
   
2 Both District leadership will monitor implementation of differentiation through e-walks. Ellis 7/1/2009 5/31/2010
   
500.00 General Fund
   
3 Both District leadership will provide training and support for improved successful transition for entry-level workplace and postsecondary reading skills. Ellis 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
1,000 P-16
   
4 Both District leadership team will monitor implementation and results of Reading Interventions for all targeted students. Ellis 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
30,000 ESS
   
Priority Need: In May 2009, 13 out of 13 elementry NCLB subgroups reached their NCLB Reading proficiency target as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading was 79.71 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Reading was 3.87 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010, the percentage of elementary students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 6.76 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Reading of 86.47 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Reading will decrease by Met Goal for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Reading of 4.25 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/Distinguished 10/29/2010 7
NCLB/AYP % Target Goals 8/30/2010 100
IOWA (NRT) National Percentcile Ranking (Not School Norm) 6/30/2010 80


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 NCLB District leadership will monitor all elementary school learning checks three times a year. Polston 7/1/2009 9/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   

Component: Science
Component Manager:
Carole Hancock
Date: 12/21/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY

Component: Social Studies
Component Manager:
Lisa Black
Date: 12/1/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need:
Goal:

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact

Component: Writing
Component Manager:
Carole Hancock
Date: 10/29/2009
Name:
PULASKI COUNTY
Priority Need: In May 2009, our middle school's Writing Index was 81.51 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Writing was 46.34 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Writing was 5.88 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010 our middle school's Writing Index will increase by 6.16 for a total Writing Index of 87.67 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 17.89 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Writing of 64.23 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Writing will decrease by -0.29 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Writing of 5.59 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/Distinguished 9/30/2010 18
EXPLORE Results % average language arts increase 1/30/2010 10


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership team will monitor the implementation of middle school writing plans including assistance with teaching strategies, portfoliios, and conferencing of the portfolio process. Colyer 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
500.00 PD
   
2 Both District leadership will conduct meetings of writing cluster leaders, as deemed necessary, to convey updated Kentucky Department of Education writing regulations and share best-practice instructional strategies. Colyer 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
 
Priority Need: In May 2009, our high school's Writing Index was 79.19 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Writing was 37.48 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Writing was 10.39 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010 our high school's Writing Index will increase by 6.94 for a total Writing Index of 86.13 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 20.84 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Writing of 58.32 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Writing will decrease by -1.8 for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Writing of 8.59 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/Distinguished 9/30/2010 21
PLAN % average increase in language arts 5/15/2010 10
ACT % average increase in language arts 4/15/2010 15
Advanced Placement % pass rate of 3,4 or 5 increase 7/15/2010 10


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership team will monitor the implementation of high school writing plans including assistance with teaching strategies, portfoliios, and conferencing of the portfolio process. Colyer 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
I District monitoring improved instruction and student success in writing.
2 Both District leadership will conduct meetings of writing cluster leaders, as deemed necessary, to convey updated Kentucky Department of Education writing regulations and share best-practice instructional strategies. Colyer 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
I District monitoring improved instruction and student success in writing.
Priority Need: In May 2009, our elementary school's Writing Index was 89.50 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished in Writing was 60.74 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. In May 2009, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Writing was 5 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.
Goal: By May 2010 our elementary school's Writing Index will increase by 3.5 for a total Writing Index of 93.00 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring proficient or distinguished will increase by 13.09 for a total percentage of all students scoring proficient or distinguished in Writing of 73.83 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test. By May 2010, the percentage of students scoring Novice in Writing will decrease by Met Goal for a total percentage of all students scoring novice in Writing of 5.00 as measured on the Kentucky Core Content Test.

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data
KCCT % increase Proficient/Distinguish 9/30/2010 13
IOWA % langauge arts average increase 6/30/2010 10


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact
1 Both District leadership team will monitor the implementation of elementary school writing plans including assistance with teaching strategies, portfoliios, and conferencing of the portfolio process. Colyer 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
500 PD
   
2 Both District leadership will conduct meetings of writing cluster leaders, as deemed necessary, to convey updated Kentucky Department of Education writing regulations and share best-practice instructional strategies. Colyer 7/1/2009 6/30/2010
   
0 No Funding
   
Priority Need:
Goal:

Benchmark
Measure Date Projected Data Actual Data


GS No. NCLBSB168 Strategy/Activity Responsible Person Start Date End Date Cost/Funding Source INI Impact